Resume or productivity footprint?

What is the standard procedure when applying for a job? You inquire about openings and the first thing you are told is “send us your resume”, right? Is this relevant anymore?

I would argue that resumes are antiquated, lifeless leftovers from a time before rich online communications. A resume is just a simple document outlining where you’ve worked before, what you did there, and how well you can embellish.

We have tools today that are so much better than a resume. The first place I go to research a prospective employee is LinkedIn. This will show me recommendations from others, previous work, communication skills, and connections.

I can do a simple Google search and find out a great deal about someone’s previous work. I would much rather read a candidate’s blog than a boring resume. A blog will tell me how well that person writes, what that person is passionate about, and what that person knows. I’m interested in what he or she posts on Twitter and why he or she finds it important. I look for a personal website that collects previous work and showcases it in a rich, living medium.

We all have a productivity footprint, which is a collection of all the work we have done, words we have published, and profiles we have created online. This productivity footprint tells me so much more about a person than a resume.

This is why I don’t really look at resumes. When someone inquires about a job at my company, I am more interested in that person’s productivity footprint than a lifeless document.

What do you think? Should we stop using resumes?

  • Robby Slaughter

    I’d prefer that we ditch resumes in favor of portfolios. A resume is a collection of claims about your abilities and your experience. In that respect it’s like a verbal description of an iceberg: the dimensions may sound impressive but it’s nothing like actually seeing the object itself.

    A portfolio, at least, is a picture of that iceberg. Most of your life’s work is buried beneath the surface but the image provides an illustration of the scope of your efforts.

    The best way to hire, however, is not by reviewing old artifacts. Instead, we should offer to pay candidates for an initial period to see what they can produce. Doing so is a real measure of their productivity, and gives them the chance to set expectations in exchange for fair compensation.

  • Michael Reynolds

    Seth Godin agrees with you :)

  • Jack Lugar

    It is surprising to see so many “progressive” companies using antiquated hiring methods.  Agreeing with Godin and you, I have started incorporating portions of my portfolio into my blog.  If an employer were to want to know more about me, I’ve made sure I’m easy to find.  In addition, I have reserved the .coms for all my children’s names so that when they are of age, they will have place to post their resume/portfolio.  This is definitely the future, and the future is now.